Sunday, 13 September 2015
In this YouTube video, Keven Barrett argues that exposing the truth on (9/11 would lead to civil war - from the 'show more' on the video:
The US government is hesitant to investigate the September 11, 2001 attacks because a real investigation of 9/11 would destabilize the US political system, according to an American scholar in Wisconsin. Dr. Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Scientific Panel for the Investigation of 9/11, made the remarks during an interview with Press TV on Friday, when the United States commemorated the 14th anniversary of the September 11, attacks that left thousands of people dead. “A real investigation of 9/11 would destabilize the United States’ political system… and it could even lead to a civil war,” Dr. Barrett said. “The truth about 9/11 is so horrific that if the American people actually were to learn that truth they would completely lose confidence in their system, because the truth of matter is that a faction of power here in the United States – the neoconservative faction – orchestrated the events of the September 11, 2001 as a New Pearl Harbor designed to launch their agenda of world domination and a rollback of freedom in the United States,” he added.
The September 11 attacks, also known as the 9/11 attacks, were a series of strikes in the US which killed nearly 3,000 people and caused about $10 billion worth of property and infrastructure damage. US officials assert that the attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists but many experts have raised questions about the official account. They believe that rogue elements within the US government orchestrated or at least encouraged the 9/11 attacks in order to accelerate the US war machine and advance the Zionist agenda. “Essentially, the United States has been ruined, its constitution has been shredded, its economy has been destroyed, all in the name of an utterly and bogus war on terrorism that started with an inside job on September 11 – a neoconservative coup d’état,” said Dr. Barrett, the author of Questioning the War on Terror. When asked why the neoconservatives did 9/11, the scholar said that “they exactly told us why they did it. Just read their writings and listen to their speeches. People like Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute of Near East Policy has open called another false flag event like 9/11, like Pearl Harbor… the fake invasion of Mexico, the Gulf of Tonkin.”
“Patrick Clawson of that leading Israeli-sponsored Jewish policy institute has told us that we need a false flag event, a fake attack, blamed on Iran to launch a war on Iran. He openly says that. You can watch him say in a video,” he stated. “The neoconservatives have openly admitted why they are doing what they are doing. They follow the Trotskyisan philosophy of governess through big lies and mass violence. And they believe they are elite that has the right even the duty to manipulate the minds of the public by creating fake terror evidence in order to achieve their agenda,” the analyst noted. “They called for a New Pearl Harbor one year before 9 /11 and they got it. They have not even hidden their trail. It’s kind of disgusting that other scholars haven’t picked up on this,” Dr. Barrett concluded.
Wednesday, 9 September 2015
A forensic study of the events of 9/11 and its claimed purpose PNAC - a NWO - from the 'Show more' section of the video:
JEB BUSH Sept 11 2001 Project for a NEW AMERICAN CENTURY - The New Pearl Harbor WTC 9/11
In the summer of 2000, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neo-conservative think tank riddled with soon to be Bush administration officials and advisors, issued a document calling for the radical restructuring of U.S. government and military policies. It advocated the massive expansion of defense spending, the re-invasion of Iraq, the military and economic securing of Afghanistan and Central Asia, increased centralized power and funds for the CIA, FBI, and NSA, among a slew of other policies that would, in the near future, be enacted upon their ascension to power. In the same document, they cite a potential problem with their plan. Referring to the goals of transforming the U.S. and global power structure, the paper states that because of the American Public's slant toward ideas of democracy and freedom, "this process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." (ibid.)
PNAC members, and signees to its policy documents, include: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wofowitz, JEB BUSH, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Scooter Libby, Elliot Abrams, Richard Armitage, William Bennet, William Kristol, and Zalmy Khalilzad - men with their hands deep in the private defense, oil, and multi-national corporate industries poised to make vast sums of money and secure huge tracts of power and influence if PNAC policy evolved into U.S. Government policy. Nine months after they rose to power, and assumed central positions of leadership up and down the spectrum of military, civilian, domestic, and international agencies, they got their 'New Pearl Harbor'. And PNAC policy essentially evolved into the Bush Administration's official agenda. While this alarmingly convenient coincidence does not prove anything in and of itself, it does establish motive. And it certainly would raise the eyebrows of concern from any serious investigator looking into the facts of September 11.
Another alarming coincidence surrounding PNAC and September 11 has been revealed by attorney Stanley Hilton. Hilton, a graduate of Harvard Law School and former senior advisor and lead counsel for Bob Dole, attended the University of Chicago as an undergraduate in the 1960s. He studied under the infamous Leo Strauss, considered by many the father of neo-conservatism. Fellow students and acquaintances of Hilton's at the time included Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. In an interview with journalist Alex Jones, Hilton reports that, under the supervision of Strauss, his senior thesis detailed a plan to establish a Presidential Dictatorship using a fabricated 'Pearl Harbor-like incident' as justification. He further states that he, Perle Wolfowitz, and other students of Strauss discussed an array of different plots and incidents 'like September 11th' and 'flying airplanes into buildings way back in the 60s'.